Let’s try this, @jack. Since Alex Jones did violate your Terms of Service, but gets to stay on the platform anyway, how about you tell us what those new Terms of Service are that allow us all to do that?
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
CONGRATULATIONS @jack! https://t.co/9xQ2ktylEo
Wishuwerethere (@Wishuwerethere)
Hey @jack! As of Friday, we know that the @twitter and @PeriscopeCo Terms don’t apply to Alex Jones, but just in case you wanted a heads up, this breaks them. https://t.co/T9Wp9JJmec
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
Good morning. @facebook @YouTube @apple @Spotify and now @Vimeo have dropped Alex Jones because of his multiple violations to their Terms of Service. @Twitter has not. This says a lot about either their Terms of Service or the ethics of the company itself.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
THIS IS CRAZY. It sounds like @twitter is actively asking Alex Jones to remove tweets and videos to avoid having to ban him. It’s like asking a bank robber to give the cash back so they can let them walk free. As a company, what are rules if you don’t enforce them??? https://t.co/A9fNiaR0n4
Serena_Spencer (@Serena_Spencer)
Good morning. We are now 5 days out from @jack tossing out the @Twitter Terms of Service to allow Alex Jones to stay on this platform without any clarification of why or if we’re all exempt from those same rules now. We should all demand answers.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
@JeffBezos Jeff, your company is the largest advertiser left on Breitbart, which denigrates Women, Muslims, the LGBTQ community, Immigrants and people of color. You host a store for Infowars, which has been responsible for harassment against Sandy Hook families.
SoonerSower (@SoonerSower)
.@shannoncoulter has an idea. And a point: If @jack refuses to honor @Twitter’s own Terms, that all of us are required to follow except for Alex Jones, why should its users remain a commodity to sell advertising? We are Twitter’s most valuable asset and he’s alienated all of us. https://t.co/6043uWyY2f
DCEngland (@DCEngland)
Hey @TwitterSupport! Awesome that you’re protecting billionaires! Mind also protecting women, people of color, immigrants and the LGBTQ community? Oh, and people like us, who had to wait 5 hours for you to take down our home address last week. https://t.co/ETAVuuAuta
c_ostrander (@c_ostrander)
Hey @AskPayPal! Just wondering how Alex Jones does not violate your Terms of Service for distributing “false, innacurate or misleading information” and/or defamation, as he has repeatedly smeared Las Vegas shooting victims and Sandy Hook parents as “actors”. Please explain? https://t.co/k8YtKnm8wb
whodiknee (@whodiknee)
First, @jack says Jones didn’t violate the rules. Next, he did break the rules, but not the current ones. Next, he broke the rules, but he’s staying. Now they didn’t get reports on the offending tweets and violations aren’t retroactive. In other words, this is bullshit. https://t.co/4pqMP3kXgW
cc_demers (@cc_demers)
This is the crux of the Jones issue for @jack. He’s bought into the fabricated idea that this is about politics rather than clear violations of the Terms of Service. Violent threats and harassment aren’t “beliefs”. They’re just violent threats and harassment. https://t.co/wf3Tr55oOi
liplezeres (@liplezeres)
Dear @TripAdvisor I am Level 6, Senior Badge memeber of TripAdvisor-family of 6 take 15-20 vacations/biz trips annually, regularly consult & contribute to TripAdvisor Discontinue your advertising relationship w/@FoxNews or I will discontinue our membership & input @slpng_giants
ReallyAliveNow (@ReallyAliveNow)
After convincing his followers to buy expired vitamins for hundreds of dollars and convincing @jack to let the @Twitter Terms of Service regarding harassment and slander slide just for him, the most miraculous thing Alex Jones has done is convince people that he’s a patriot. https://t.co/iInjf8T9pA
GayRiot (@GayRiot)
Great thread and one that perfectly encapsulates our feelings. @jack, through his blind spot for Alex Jones, has nullified @twitter’s Terms of Service, has alienated those of us who attempt to abide by the rules and has given up any moral authority over his platform.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
.@shannoncoulter has an idea. And a point: If @jack refuses to honor @Twitter’s own Terms, that all of us are required to follow except for Alex Jones, why should its users remain a commodity to sell advertising? We are Twitter’s most valuable asset and he’s alienated all of us.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
Shout out to everyone who is demanding @facebook & @TeamYouTube keep Alex Jones on their social network despite his repeated rule violations while also demanding the @nfl punish players for peacefully protesting!
fueledbyrock (@fueledbyrock)
@KingofKevs @jack @Twitter No. Sorry. This platform has rules that we all have agreed to follow. On Friday, @jack admitted that Alex Jones broke those rules and has not banned him, as the rest of us would be. Jones can yell anything he wants on a street corner, but he broke the rules here.
barret_williams (@barret_williams)
First, @jack says Jones didn’t violate the rules. Next, he did break the rules, but not the current ones. Next, he broke the rules, but he’s staying. Now they didn’t get reports on the offending tweets and violations aren’t retroactive. In other words, this is bullshit.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
This is the type of person that @jack will allow on this platform after admitting that he very clearly broke their Terms of Service. This is who he’s willing to break his own rules for.
ameliababy4 (@ameliababy4)
This is really interesting. Seeing this from Sleeping Giants followers for the last two days. Why are people just now getting notifications from @Twitter that Jones violated their Terms? And why are those offending tweets still up? Would love to see @oliverdarcy dig into this. https://t.co/GIC7o3K87F
AundriLove (@AundriLove)
Good morning. @facebook @YouTube @apple @Spotify and now @Vimeo have dropped Alex Jones because of his multiple violations to their Terms of Service. @Twitter has not. This says a lot about either their Terms of Service or the ethics of the company itself.
brightblonde123 (@brightblonde123)
Good morning. We are now 5 days out from @jack tossing out the @Twitter Terms of Service to allow Alex Jones to stay on this platform without any clarification of why or if we’re all exempt from those same rules now. We should all demand answers.
itsmommy (@itsmommy)
THIS IS CRAZY. It sounds like @twitter is actively asking Alex Jones to remove tweets and videos to avoid having to ban him. It’s like asking a bank robber to give the cash back so they can let them walk free. As a company, what are rules if you don’t enforce them??? https://t.co/A9fNiaR0n4
Maximinalist (@Maximinalist)
Great thread and one that perfectly encapsulates our feelings. @jack, through his blind spot for Alex Jones, has nullified @twitter’s Terms of Service, has alienated those of us who attempt to abide by the rules and has given up any moral authority over his platform. https://t.co/OsUPeAAqbW
ZachQuackery (@ZachQuackery)
Let’s try this, @jack. Since Alex Jones did violate your Terms of Service, but gets to stay on the platform anyway, how about you tell us what those new Terms of Service are that allow us all to do that?
carlgrz (@carlgrz)
Check out what @shannoncoulter is doing with #BlockParty, everyone. Her point is simple: If @jack won’t follow his own Terms of Service with Alex Jones, why should his users who DO abide by them be used as a revenue stream? https://t.co/WC9Mob73Za
georgebernhard (@georgebernhard)
After convincing his followers to buy expired vitamins for hundreds of dollars and convincing @jack to let the @Twitter Terms of Service regarding harassment and slander slide just for him, the most miraculous thing Alex Jones has done is convince people that he’s a patriot.
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
.@jack: Hey Alex. Need a favor, man. Alex Jones: Sure. What’s up? @jack: You know how I said I’d fly cover for you and keep you on this platform even though you’ve broken our Terms of Service countless times? AJ: Yeah? @jack: I just need you to do one thing. https://t.co/prQi3g1ySE
barquentine2001 (@barquentine2001)
Hey @jack! As of Friday, we know that the @twitter and @PeriscopeCo Terms don’t apply to Alex Jones, but just in case you wanted a heads up, this breaks them. https://t.co/T9Wp9JJmec
pjem476 (@pjem476)
Love all of the victimhood and pearl clutching for a dude who regularly attacks Sandy Hook parents, calls Vegas shooting victims “actors” and has 3 different social networks tripping over their dicks to avoid enforcing their own rules on him. https://t.co/8mwvPvBxRm
scottRcrawford (@scottRcrawford)
This is what was written about us on 4Chan, a platform with no Terms of Service. This is what @Twitter will look like if they don’t enforce their Terms. If they want people, and advertisers, to leave, they quickest way is to allow threats and conspiracies to run rampant. https://t.co/Jnz4KlsUz5
JenPetterson (@JenPetterson)
Check out what @shannoncoulter is doing with #BlockParty, everyone. Her point is simple: If @jack won’t follow his own Terms of Service with Alex Jones, why should his users who DO abide by them be used as a revenue stream?
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
THIS IS CRAZY. It sounds like @twitter is actively asking Alex Jones to remove tweets and videos to avoid having to ban him. It’s like asking a bank robber to give the cash back so they can let them walk free. As a company, what are rules if you don’t enforce them???
slpng_giants (@slpng_giants)
Never before have so many media sources given so much airtime to a proud racist. Now they’re putting him on stage and making money off of him. What a cynical ploy to sell tickets and make a fast buck. This is an embarrassment, @TheEconomist. https://t.co/CLgpRFyum2
rocknerd (@rocknerd)
@slpng_giants @jack @Twitter @PeriscopeCo Hey @jack! please explain., wTF?? we know that the @twitter and @PeriscopeCo Terms don’t apply to Alex Jones, but just in case you wanted a heads up, this breaks them..
Miriklord (@Miriklord)